Sherlock Homes is my favorite character in The Hound of the Baskervilles. Sherlock is a great detective but also does not seem to work in the ordinary way. His methods for being a detective are different than you would expect. He is also a very kind and helpful person in the book.
My favorite part of the book is in the beginning of chapter fourteen when Sherlock Homes, Watson, and Sherlocks friend Lestrade go to save Sir Henry because they knew Stapleton was going to murder him. They were hiding behind rocks watching Stapleton, the murderer, and Sir Henry, the victim. They were planning on capturing Stapleton, when they heard a scream which was Sir Henry. Their whole plan got thrown off. The men saved Sir henry but instead if capturing Stapleton they killed the giant hound that was chasing Sir Henry.
One question that I have is - How did Stapleton keep the vicious hound a secret for such a long time? It would be very hard making sure that the hound is ready for action, not to loud and not to obvious. Adding on to this question is where did Stapleton find such an animal? Did Stapleton do something to the hound that turned it into a beast that killed for him?
Congratulations on being the first to post! Hopefully a few of your classmates will be able to suggest some answers for the questions you ask. There are clues in the book. My question for you is this:
What are three things Holmes does that make him seem abnormal or different from what you would expect in a detective? Explain what seems unusual about the examples you give.
My favorite character in The Hound of The Baskervilles had to be Sherlock Holmes. I like him because he was always one step ahead of everyone else, and he suspected Stapleton before he got the latest update from Dr. Watson. Sherlock always does background information on his cases so he can know a little bit more about what he is dealing with, and I think that’s a good quality to have. He is a very gifted detective and loves a good mystery case when he can find one.
My favorite scene was when Holmes, Watson, and Lestrade were hiding outside the Stapleton’s house waiting for Sir Henry to leave dinner. Their plans go south when they hear Sir Henry scream on the way back to his house. The hound was attacking Sir Henry so they need to save him and kill the hound. While they were doing that it gave Stapleton plenty of time to escape. I like this scene because there is an exciting yet fearful tension in the group waiting outside. They are excited to finally catch Stapleton in the act, but they have no idea what they are up against.
A question that I have is – Why is Holmes so secretive about his theories and ideas? I would think that since Watson and Holmes are partners they would be more open about their theories.
Good question, Samantha. Isaih has a few thoughts on that issue below. Here is your question:
What was Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s purpose in including the story of Selden, a criminal, but not the one responsible for the violent hound? Try to think of at least two reasons he may have included this character and side plot.
To answer your question concerning how and where the Hound was held.
Mr. Stapleton discovered an abandoned tin mine in the Grimpen mire, a swamp neighboring the moor. It was here within its depths that Stapleton kept the hound. He starved it by rarely sending his manservant to feed the large, mix-breed, hound. This starving cause the hound to become aggressive and feral, which meant that taking it out by day was not advised. The mine was only able to conceal most of its noise, twice in the book a howl is heard. Stapleton also treated the hound to a black phosphorus paste (phosphorous give things a trait of fire and explosiveness, it is used in firecrackers) to give the hound a devilish look. When the hound was ready to be used, Stapleton brought it out to an outhouse next to his estate which he could only do for a short period of time because of the size and noise of the hound. To make the animal track and kill, he would use an article of clothing owned by the target (Henry Baskervilles old black boot) and send him loose at night. This is what killed Seldon the convict. He was wearing Henry's old clothing when he was hiding out at night and was spooked into falling off a cliff. The animal was bought in London at a pet store, and it was said to be a special mix breed of a mastiff (they are famous for their size) and a bloodhound (famous for their tracking abilities). I hope this helped.
In response to Ms. Baudinet's question, I think that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle included the side plot of Selden, the criminal, so it would make the Barrymores seem suspicious. It made the Barrymores look suspicious because at night Mr. Barrymore was sneaking around to give Selden, who is also Mrs. Barrymore's brother, food. Another reason that the author included Selden may have been because of his criminal reputation as a very atrocious person. For that reason some people may think, in the beginning of the book, that he was responsible for the hound and the killings. Those are the two reasons that I think the author included Selden.
My favorite character was Sherlock Holmes. He is my favorite character because he was able to keep his presence a secret for such a long time. He was also able to make a great educated guess on everything about Mr. Mortimer just by looking at his cane that he left at Sherlock's home/office.
My favorite part of the book was when Sherlock and Watson were waiting for the hound. This was my favorite part because this was the only part of the book where I felt any real suspense. I also liked it because the hound was so vicious that it froze Sherlock and Watson in place and they almost missed their chance.
A criticism of the book I have is that I personally never got really interested in the story until the very end. The book never made me feel anything except when I felt suspense for a paragraph or two when they were waiting for and chasing the hound. - Isaih O'Sullivan
What are three incidents that really highlight Watson's amateur status as a detective? In other words, can you list three times Watson screws up or seems foolish or unintelligent?
Three incidents that highlights Watsons status as a detective are when he went to the cave home he left a cigarette butt outside and that signified his presence. Another time when Watson screws up is when Sherlock says that both of them will be going back to London he thought they were actually going back to London. He also messed up when he was questioning Mrs. Lyons he didn't ask who sent her or what caused her to not go to the hall. -Isaih O'Sullivan
Isaiah, I noticed we saw eye to eye on most of the book. For example, we both had the same favorite part of the book, which is when Sherlock and Watson wait for the hound. On the same token, we both disliked the book and we had the same problems with the book. Our main problem with the book was how boring most of it was. However, our favorite characters were very different, yours was Sherlock and mine was Stapleton. Now, I understand why you choose Sherlock thanks to your excellent explanation. Yet, unlike you I could not get over his plain personality and arrogance . Still I thought he was an amazing detective, which is why he is your favorite character . Although I found that Stapleton was just as smart as Sherlock, I liked his thinking, despite it being evil, and that is why he was my favorite character.
Kaitlin, I think Sherlock is so secretive because if he lets other people know it could slip into the wrong persons hands and could be messed up. His theories could be messed up by said person changing how he does things. His plans could be messed up if said person waits in ambush or sets a trap. Hope this answered your question. -Isaih O'Sullivan
Isaiah, I agree that the book was not that interesting in the beginning. There was no action or suspense until the last 4-5 chapters. As you finish the earlier chapters instead of suspense they would tell you what they discovered in an uneventful way. That made me feel like I did not want to read on because there wasn’t that much excitement.
MIss Baudinet- In the Hound of the Baskerville Sherlock Holmes has an abnormal and unusual behavior compared to other detectives. For example Sherlock Holmes always has to be neat and clean no matter what situation he is in. When he was staying up in the moor he has a young boy bring him fresh food, linen, and other objects. Most detectives should be able to live in gross circumstances . Sherlock also can be misleading at some points in the book. He lets Watson believe that he is doing all the work even though Sherlock does not trust him. Most detectives have partner that they can trust. Lastly Sherlock sets up Sir Henry and puts him in a dangerous situation. He puts his clients life in jeopardy and could have gotten him killed. A detective should be honest with his clients and would tell them what the plan is. Sherlock Holmes definitely has his own unique ways of solving the case.
My favorite character in The Hound of the Baskervilles is Sherlock Holmes. I like Holmes because he kept secretive even to his own partner. Sherlock Holmes is also a great detective and is very different in so living his crimes, which I think is interesting.
My favorite part of the book is when Holmes and Watson set up their trap to catch Stapleton at his own home. I liked this part because of the suspense it has. You thought that the pair would get Stapleton but they heard a cry from Sir Henry Baskerville and ended up killing the hound.
A critique I had- I wish we would have been able to find out Stapleton's motive to kill so many people. Was it because he was hurt in the past? I am disappointed from this ending. I believe it would have been better with some explanation, - Maggie McLaughlin
Make sure to read carefully! As my question for you, I give you back your own critique: What was Stapleton's motive for killing so many people?
This question is clearly answered in the book. It is hinted at earlier when Holmes looks at a the portraits in Baskerville Hall. Then it is explained clearly in the last chapter, "A Retrospection." I suggest rereading this chapter. When you explain Stapleton's motives, please quote at least one line from the last chapter that helped you figure out the answer. Let me know if you have questions.
Kaitlin, I think the hound may have been kept at his home in a room that you cannot hear anything from. I know that Mr.Stapleton would not reveal himself. Maybe, Miss Stapleton knew about the hound but did not reveal it. I think she may not have exposed the hound and Stapleton because of a threat or fear of being killed by it. - Maggie McLaughlin
To begin my writing, I am to say that I personally found that Dr. Watson was my favorite character. I found him to be like an apprentice to Holmes and he was more easy to relate to the reader. I liked this trait of Watson because it made me feel as if I was in the story. If Sherlock Holmes was more "realistic" (he acted as a deus ex machina more than anything else in my opinion) I would enjoyed the book slightly more (I did love it though),but he solves the cases to easily which makes Watson look like he has only just begun his career. Another concern I have is that the climax was very quick and underwhelming (I read the original print just as it was in The strand magazine with dates and all). I found it underwhelming because the event happened very quickly. This may be the point however because that is how all crimes must go, quick and quiet. My favorite part of the whole book was definitely the discovery of Barrymore signaling the criminal. This scene gave me the true feeling of tension and excitement as they were slowly creeping up on him. While reading that scene I truly began to feel suspicious of Barrymore and pinned the crime on him in my head with a (admittedly weak) theory on how he would pull the crime off. But to my surprise it was not Barrymore and i felt a slight sense of relief and disappointment when it was cleared up.
Very thoughtful response! Thank you for correcting some of your mistakes as well (although proofreading before publishing would be preferable). Here is your question:
The following selection is from Ch. 15. Explain what Holmes means here and give an example (other than the boot) of an incident in the story that fits this description.
"The more outre and grotesque an incident is the more carefully it deserves to be examined, and the very point which appears to complicate a case is, when duly considered and scientifically handled, the one which is most likely to elucidate it."
To begin, what Holmes means to say in this line is that certain evidence can be quite deceptive at first glance. In the case of the boot, Holmes believed that it was a minor and unimportant event witch required very little of his attention, yet in the end it proved to be a key part in the case. Another piece of evidence witch shared this same "trait" was the discovery of Barrymore signaling Seldon. After this was discovered, Watson believed that it was not going to play any part within his real case, but later that was proven wrong. If it was not for the discovery of Seldon, Mr. Barrymore would not have given him Mr. Baskerville's clothes (he had to give away as much as he could because he might not reappear) witch led to Seldon being tracked and killed by the hound. If not for this, Stapleton would not have shown up by the crime scene and would not have confirmed Watson and Holmes's theory of Stapleton being the mastermind of the crime.
I agree completely about your critique stating how “the climax was very quick and underwhelming.” The buildup in the previous chapters were profoundly detailed that when the climax happened, it undermined my expectations. Also, considering how the chapters prior to the climax were written, it was very rushed. I had to reread chapter fourteen to catch all the details stated in that scene.
My favorite character in "The Hound of the Baskervilles" is Sherlock Holmes. Sherlock has all the qualities of a good detective. He makes wise decisions, he thinks about the case, and plans ahead of time, and he takes notes on the littlest things. He thoroughly investigates his cases, making sure not to leave out anything important, and that's what makes him such a keen detective.
My favorite part of the book was the last chapter (15). I found this chapter very helpful and informative. The author wanted to make sure you understood the final results of the case and what happened with Stapleton. I liked that chapter because it took me through the issue once more, and filled in the missing pieces well.
A criticism of the book I have is that the scenes seemed to change quickly. One minute the characters are somewhere, and the next they're somewhere else. In my opinion, that made it hard to follow and suddenly I became lost.
I'm sorry for the delay. Here is your question: Explain how the character Laura Lyons tied in with the mystery and helped Holmes solve it.
Also, if you can add anything to your original post to make it less vague, that would be helpful. Currently, your comments could describe almost any mystery story. Giving examples, specifically in the third paragraph, could improve your post.
In addition to my first post, Holmes takes notes on the littlest things such as information before the mystery occurred, dates and times of certain events, and background knowledge of specific characters that may be tied into the case.
Also, one of the scenes that seem to change quickly is when Holmes returns from Devonshire, England and surprises Watson, and the all the sudden, they catch Stapleton and kill the hound.
I'm going to have to agree with Isaih on this one. The story definitely seemed boring, except for the last few chapters when there were suspense. I think that this may be because of the words used in the book. Some of the words, I think, were above our grade level. They were words I've never seen nor heard before and that made me become confused/ uninterested.
In the book The Hound of the Baskervilles, my favorite character is Sherlock Holmes. Although quite sly, Holmes is an honest and respectable man. As a detective, Holmes is very rigorous and meticulous in his work. He shows many great qualities of being an exceptional detective, such as being indiscrete and observant.
My favorite part of the book is when Watson discovers Holmes hiding out in the moor. Watson’s reaction when Holmes walks through the old, abandoned mine hut is very amusing. This scene shows how dedicated and observant Holmes can truly be.
One criticism that I have with the book is that I do not like how chapters eight and nine are presented in reports. Personally, I do not enjoy reading books that address to specific people, which in this case, was Holmes. I understand that a substantial part of Holmes’ case depended on those notes, but I didn’t think Watson’s notes were worth two chapters. Another criticism that I had about the book was that I didn’t like how Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the author, left Mr. Stapleton’s death. He describes his death as, “somewhere in the heart of the great Grimpen Mire, down in the foul slime of the huge morass which sucks him in, this old and cruel-hearted man is forever buried.” After examining the book multiple times, there is no actual proof that Stapleton is truly dead, for they only assume he is. I would like more detail about his death, for his death is too vague for me.
Can you briefly compare and contrast Selden and Stapleton in appearance and character? Sir Arthur Conan Doyle means for Stapleton to be the more sinister of the two criminals. Explain why Stapleton seems, in the end, more dangerous than Selden did.
Miss Baudinet
P.S. I think you mean to say Holmes is discreet, not indiscreet.
In the book the Hound of the Baskervilles, Selden, the convict, is perceived as a murderous convict. Selden is very dependent for he needs Mr. and Mrs. Barrymore to feed him. He also looks very raggedy and dirty because he has been in the moor for quite sometime. Mr. Stapleton, on the other hand, is a well-educated man that is very proper and poised. Unlike Selden, his clothing is neat and professional. Stapleton, in the end of the book seemed more dangerous than Selden because we find out he killed Sir Charles Baskerville in the beginning of the book in such a tortuous way. We also see how much effort and dedication went into killing the Baskervilles off.
My favorite character in Hound of the Baskervilles is Sherlock Holmes. Holmes is a very mysterious and intelligent man. With every clue that he gets he reads between the lines and figures out the mystery much faster than Watson ever would've been able to do without him.
My favorite scene of the book was when Holmes and Watson tell Laura Lyons about Mr. Stapleton putting on an act about how Mrs. Stapleton was his sister when it was really his wife. I like this scene becsuse because you know this is leading up to the climax and that there is a little more to Mr. Stapleton than we think.
I feel that the ending of the book could've gone on a little longer to find out what happened after because it ended suddenly and a litttle unexpected.
Can you be a little more specific about your criticism? It is a little vague. Remember that your posts should show strong knowledge of the book.
Here is my question for you:
Can you explain two or three times when Stapleton does something in front of Watson that, in hindsight, might indicate he is the one behind the attacks. In other words, looking back, did any of Stapleton's actions seem strange, cruel, or otherwise suspicious?
Continued Criticism: I feel that the author couldve explained a little more when Holmes and Watsom got back to their house. I would've liked to know their thoughts on the whole situation.
Some clues about Stapleton being behind all the mischief around the moor were the fact that he was tricking people into thinking Mrs. Stapleton was his sister when t was really his wife. Another clue was when Sir Henry meets with Mrs Stapleton then Stapleton came over yeling and then apologizes and asks if Sir Henry would join them for dinner. Both of these show that he was hiding his identity and that there is more to him than we think
My favorite character in The Hound of the Baskervilles was Dr. Watson. I liked Dr. Watson because he was very brave going to Baskerville Hall, which was right near the moor, to help his client, Sir Henry Baskerville, escape a certain death. I also liked Dr. Watson he was persistently trying to keep Sir Henry Baskerville safe from the hound terrorizing the moor.
My favorite part of the book was when Sherlock Holmes shot the hound. I liked when Sherlock shot the hound because it put an end to the murders and stopped Stapleton's hound from terrorizing the Baskerville family anymore. Also, this put a stop to the hound accidentally killing the wrong person, like Selden, the convict.
I had one criticism of the book. I did not like how it took the majority of the book to really make you want to read more and get the reader really intrigued. The first twelve chapters were okay but they didn't have enough action to set the foundation for the big action scene at the end of the book.
In response to Meghan's post, I agree with you completely that the book was not very exciting until the last two or three chapters. In contrast, in any good mystery it's not interesting until the very end when all the facts and evidence start to pile up. I guess it is all a matter of opinion whether you think the mystery is uninteresting or still developing.
In my post it should say I also liked Dr. Watson (because) he was persistently trying to keep Sir Henry Baskerville safe from the hound terrorizing the moor.
Based on this book, what are three character flaws (negative qualities) Holmes seems to possess? Explain your reasoning by mentioning at least one thing he says or does from each of the three sections of the book (beginning, middle, end). In other words, don't answer this simply based on one single conversation he has. Base your answer on his behavior throughout the whole story.
I believe that Holmes is so secretive about his theories and ideas because, being a detective as he is, you learn that you shouldn't trust anybody. I also agree with Samantha that Sherlock Holmes probably should have told his partner in advance about the plan. Yet, I think that he did not tell Watson in everyone's best interest. For example, if Dr. Watson knew about where Holmes was staying, he might be tempted to go deliver news about the case in person. In that case, if Stapleton were watching the moor through his telescope, he might suspect that something was going on. So, Holmes' decision to not tell Watson was, in my opinion, in the best interest of everyone.
I am not that big of a fan when it come to mystery books. However I like reading the Hardy Boys back in fifth grade. Sherlock Holmes was not very interesting to me, I found it very hard to make myself read this book. In the first ten chapters we learned about the crime and who the main suspects were in the case. I understand they had to explain the case but ten chapters is too much.
The book was so boring, even during the climax of the story in the last five chapters, it got a lot better, but still did not entertain me. I like books that are action packed with multiple problems and different possible outcomes. Also, a book can almost never be good when the main character is as annoying as Sherlock Holmes. My main problem with him was his arrogance, he is more arrogant than Richard Sherman (a really big punk in the NFL). Even the way Sherlock Holmes talks, such as “But, tell me, Watson, what do you make of our visitor’s stick?” has to many pauses and is long winded. The book could have been better if even one of the characters had been even just a little funny, however, no one was funny and the book never made me laugh.
I am not that big of a fan when it come to mystery books. However I like reading the Hardy Boys back in fifth grade. Sherlock Holmes was not very interesting to me, I found it very hard to make myself read this book. In the first ten chapters we learned about the crime and who the main suspects were in the case. I understand they had to explain the case but ten chapters is too much.
The book was so boring, even during the climax of the story in the last five chapters, it got a lot better, but still did not entertain me. I like books that are action packed with multiple problems and different possible outcomes. Also, a book can almost never be good when the main character is as annoying as Sherlock Holmes. My main problem with him was his arrogance, he is more arrogant than Richard Sherman (a really big punk in the NFL). Even the way Sherlock Holmes talks, such as “But, tell me, Watson, what do you make of our visitor’s stick?” has to many pauses and is long winded. The book could have been better if even one of the characters had been even just a little funny, however, no one was funny and the book never made me laugh.
Sorry here is the rest of my other post. My favorite character was Stapleton, even though he was the bad guy I thought his plan was really clever. Now I wish he was good but then the book would have no story. Many of his choices worked for a while till Sherlock Holmes discovered them. I bet however if it was not as big of a crime such as, if he killed an elder who lives alone, he could have gotten away with it. My favorite part of the book was chapter fourteen when Sherlock Holmes saves Sir Henry by killing the hound. This is the climax as well as the start of the falling action which normally are the biggest points of a book. This chapter stood out even more due to the fact that the rest of the book was boring. Still this chapter was the biggest part of the book which is why it is my favorite.
Good point about Holmes's arrogance. Spot on. Here is your question:
Can you describe three ways that the lack of 21st century technology made the case more difficult to solve than it might be today? (Or, what are three ways that modern technology might have made the case easier to solve?)If you're stuck, think about all the difficulties presented by the remote location of Baskerville Hall.
While reading the Hound of The Baskervilles I realized the case was a lot harder because of the time the story was set in, the past and not the present. An example of this is when Sir Charles dies at the start of the book, he would have brought his phone and a flashlight in present day. This would have allowed him to not only see the dog faster but also video tape his death or call 911. On the same token, Sir Henry would have left Baskervilles and would have been put in a safe house, where the dog could not attack him.
During the case, technology would have made it easier for Sherlock. Sherlock would have been able to watch the moor with cameras which would have shown Stapleton going down to the moor. Also the police would have looked for suspects and realized who Stapleton really was and would have interrogated him. Mrs. Stapleton would have been able to call for help when Stapleton was planning the attacks and when he hid her. From evidence of the case, which would have included food and supplies in the cave, they would have been able to scan for Stapleton thumbprints.
I agree with Lauren about how the scene changes were very sudden and somethimes hard to follow. I feel like almost every other chapter you had to read certain parts multiple times to figure out where they went. This made the book a little difficult to understand. I think the authour could've done a better job at hinting at or stating where they were.
Miss Baudinet, I am sorry about the mistake. I reread the chapter and found Stapleton's motive. His motive was an estate. Stapleton was the nephew of Sir Charles Baskerville and he had embezzled money so he moved twice and changed his name. When he realized that there were only two people in the way of the family fortune, Sir Charles and Sir Henry, he sought out to kill them. A line that helped find this was "The fellow had evidently made inquiry and found that only two lives stood between him and a valuable estate". -Maggie McLaughlin
Holmes shows the character flaw, condescension, when dealing with his partner Watson. For example, in a conversation between Holmes and Watson, Holmes says “I am afraid, my dear Watson, that most of your conclusions were erroneous.” This shows that Holmes doesn't think of Watson on the same level of intelligence as himself. Another character flaw that Holmes shows is accusing. When Watson and himself were looking over a body, killed by the hound, that they thought was Sir Henry, was when this flaw really stood out. In this conversation Holmes shows the flaw of being accusatory when he says “And you, Watson, see what comes of abandoning your charge!” This shows that Holmes feels bad about how the man got killed so he decided to blame the issue on Watson. Also, pride is a major character flaw in Holmes. This shows when he says “It's a thousand to one against our finding him at the house,” he continued as we retraced our steps swiftly down the path. This example shows that Holmes feels like he is correct in his theories most of the time and does not doubt himself enough.
In the Hound of the Baskervilles, my favorite character opinion changed as i went on reading the book. In the beginning i liked Sherlock Holmes, and his ability to problem solve and pick up on things like when trying to figure out who sent the note to Sir Henry, he observed that the note had ink spatters, connecting him to the conclusion, that the note was written at a hotel verses his home, because hotels have usually pens with bad ink. However, as the book went on I began to admire and enjoy the character Watson, Holmes' assistant, more and more. I like Watson's easygoing and very responsive personality and as the book went on, Watson seems to be more in the spotlight/more present then Holmes himself. Watson was the one who went on the stakeout and was the one to approach the Barrymores about their secret. Overall, i liked Watson's personality more and enjoyed reading about him in the book more than anyone else.
My favorite part of the book, had to have been chapter nine. I liked chapter nine, because i felt the most suspense and thrill going on. Watson and Sir Henry staked out all night by the Barrymore's window to observe Mr. Barrymore and his actions, that might have something to do with Mrs. Barrymore and her distressed appearance, of late. Watson could have been in much danger, and could have put others in much danger by observing Mr. Barrymore, but he took the chance in order to help solve/end the Baskervilles case.
If i were to have one question/ critique after reading The Hound of the Baskervilles, it would have to be that the amount of characters and relationships in the book were,I felt, overwhelming and confusing. I felt this way especially in the end when Mr. Stapleton's dark and secretive past was revealed and his relationship between himself and "his sister" Miss Stapleton (really his wife) I also was confused about what happened in the end to Laura Lyons and Mr. Stapleton's plan in itself to destroy Sir Henry was a bit hard to latch on to, from my point of view.
Thanks for your post. Remember to capitalize the word "I." Here is your question:
Can you please explain how the setting in the story helps to increase the suspense, fear, and mystery of the book? (You'll have to briefly mention what the setting is to answer this.)
In response, to Natasha's post, i would have to agree in the sense that I was surprised when Holmes surprised/startled Watson and Sir Henry on the Moor, but would have to disagree in the point being made about Holmes and his personality. If i was Watson, I would be relieved in a sense, that no one dangerous was out behind the brush, but would be somewhat upset/annoyed that Holmes didn't trust me enough to solve the rest of the case on my own. I respect Holmes' "always one step ahead" personalty, but don't always agree with it especially when it comes to trusting Watson to finish the case... after all, Watson figured it out enough to get to the moor to begin with.
Miss Baudinet, The Hound of the Baskervilles, takes place in London in the year 1889. The story begins and ends at Holmes's office at 221b Baker Street, in London. Since the book is a mystery novel, the goal is to create fear and suspense in the readers mind, as they read through the book. This can be achieved by the author through the setting of the story. The majority of the suspense in the story, comes from the secrets and unsolved mysteries of the lonely moorlands. One particular section of the book, that created suspense and fear for me as a reader personally, was when Watson went to try to find the mysterious figure on the moor that might be of assistance to solving/ending the case. The moor is so big, open, unexplored and lonely, that mystery and fear already exist on the land. Aside from the moor, the rundown Merripit House also poses as a hide out and meeting place to wait for Stapleton at the end of the case. After reading this book, I would agree that the setting of the book does contribute/does attribute with the fear and suspense of the story.
Miss Baudinet, The Hound of the Baskervilles, takes place in London in the year 1889. The story begins and ends at Holmes's office at 221b Baker Street, in London. Since the book is a mystery novel, the goal is to create fear and suspense in the readers mind, as they read through the book. This can be achieved by the author through the setting of the story. The majority of the suspense in the story, comes from the secrets and unsolved mysteries of the lonely moorlands. One particular section of the book, that created suspense and fear for me as a reader personally, was when Watson went to try to find the mysterious figure on the moor that might be of assistance to solving/ending the case. The moor is so big, open, unexplored and lonely, that mystery and fear already exist on the land. Aside from the moor, the rundown Merripit House also poses as a hide out and meeting place to wait for Stapleton at the end of the case. After reading this book, I would agree that the setting of the book does contribute/does attribute with the fear and suspense of the story.
My favorite character in The Hound of the Baskervilles was Dr. Watson because he was able to gather lots of information without the help of Sherlock Holmes and that is important because if he could not the case would have taken much longer. He also made me laugh when he had dinner with the neighbors on the moor when he was supposed to be gathering more information on the case. My favorite part in the book was when Watson is sitting in one of the abandoned huts on the moor waiting for a man to walk in and it turned out to be Sherlock Holmes. I liked it because Watson had his pistol drawn ready for it to be some sort of dangerous criminal yet it was his partner. I expected this book to be more thrilling and suspenseful but I felt like there wasn't much emotion showed. It seemed very bland and didn't get me excited when anything happened.
Who is Mr. Frankland and how does he contribute to the progression of the plot? (First describe him and explain who he is and what he does. Then explain how he helps move the story along by helping Watson clear up some of the mysteries in the book.)
Miss Baudinet, Mr. Frankland is Laura Lyons father who we hear about in chapter ten. He is perceived as being somewhat out of his mind. Mr. Frankland likes to be involved in lawsuits that don't necessarily benefit him. Mr. Frankland spends his time looking over the moor with his telescope when he hears about the escaped convict. Mr. Frankland helps Watson by giving him information about finding the "criminal". Watson then goes out to catch the "criminal" but it turns out to be his partner Sherlock Holmes.
In response to Natasha's post I agree how Mr. Stapleton's death was very unclear. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle did not give much detail about the setting and I had a hard time picturing the moor and the surrounding areas. This was a problem for me when I tried to figure out where Mr. Stapleton died because the author left it fairly unclear.
In the book "The Hound of the Baskervilles", a woman named Laura Lyons was tied in with the mystery, and helped Holmes solve it. Mr. Stapleton, was actually in line to inherit the Baskerville fortune. For this reason, he wanted Sir Charles Baskerville dead, so he could then receive the money. Therefore, Laura Lyons was only a toy in Stapleton's game. Stapleton convinced her to schedule an appointment with Sir Charles, to help her with her previous affairs, and then miss it. Having brought Sir Charles onto the moors, Stapleton released his devilish hound, which frightened Sir Charles Baskerville and caused a heart attack. When Watson interviewed Laura Lyons and got the information needed, he immediately told Holmes, which helped him to piece the mystery together more.
I disliked Sherlock Holmes at first; he did not seem to care much about the Baskervilles and was willing to rely on Watson for most of the case. However this proves not to be true Holmes was always in some way involved. He used a young boy Named Cartwright to watch Watson and reported back to him on what was going on. Sherlock Holmes was able to solve the mystery once he did some research on the suspects and got the information from Watson. He takes risks like allowing Sir Henry to go to Merripit House and be chased by the hound, but in the end it all works out. For these reasons Sherlock Holmes is my favorite character. -Joscelyn Rebello
My favorite character was Mrs. Stapleton because despite what her husband says and does to her to keep her quite she finds the good in her heart to warn Sir Henry about the danger that is upon him. But at the same time Mrs. Stapleton thinks through what she is doing and finds a smart way to warn Sir Henry that leaves very little evidence. My favorite part of the book was when the convict Selden died. I found it very funny how Sherlock and Dr. Watson are distraught over the death of “Sir Henry” and expressing how they believe it to be their fault that their friend is dead. But when Sherlock Holmes turns the body over they find it to be Selden. My criticism for the book is it is quite unbelievable that the hound would eat another dog (Dr. Mortimer’s spaniel). I find it just weird (in the bad way) that the hound would do that. -Merissa
Here is your question: What is the meaning of the idiom "red herring"? Look it up online and then give an example of a red herring in "The Hound of the Baskervilles." Explain what makes it a red herring.
In response to Kaitlin's post Stapleton found such an animal at Ross and Mangles in London on Fulham Road. You can find all that information on page 214. And as to your third question, Stapleton got the hound to kill for him probably by treating him right and having a close relationship with it because a dog will do almost anything for its owner if it is treated right. But I could be wrong. -Merissa
I am replying to Miss Baudinet’s question of three examples of when Watson messes up. One example is when he gets mad at Sherlock for not telling him of his presence in the moor when if he just thought it through he would understand that the more people who knew of his position the more the likely word would get out and the investigation would be compromised. A second example is when Sherlock points out a family portrait and it takes Watson some time to catch on that it looks just like Mr. Stapleton. My third example is when Watson looks away from the path while on a steak-out knowing that the hound will show soon and that his friend’s life is in danger and misses his mark; nearly costing Sir Henry his life. -Merissa
My favorite part of the book is when Watson goes out on the moor looking for the unknown man. Watson had no idea who the man is or if the man was dangerous. Watson followed the path he saw a young boy took to give the man food. When Watson arrives at were the man is staying the man was not there so Watson waited for him to come back. While Watson is waiting he finds a note that reads "Dr. Watson has gone to Coombe Tracey" which makes him think the man is stalking him. The strange man ends up being Holmes after this the story really starts to come together. The question I have on the book is dose Watson have a job or dose he just work with Holmes?
What do you think of the Barrymores? Were they criminals? If you were Sir Henry, would you have turned them over to the police? Fired them? Helped them feed Selden?
In response to Merissa’s question dogs will definitely eat other dogs. It’s not the hound was raised to be nice either it was raised to kill people a small dog would be ease. People have killed people and people have also eaten people why should dogs be any different. The hound was probably hungry and the small dog was the first thing it could get its teeth into. -Joscelyn Rebello
Here is my answer to Miss Baudinet’s question. A red herring is a clue that misleads and or distracts. An example of a red herring in The Hound of the Baskervilles is when Mr. Stapleton gives the taxi driver the name Sherlock Holmes. When Sherlock interrogates the taxi driver the name he receives is his own. This didn’t help Sherlock in his quest of solving the case Sir Henry presented to him. -Merissa Silva
I think that the Barrymores were good people who committed a crime. the Barrymores tried to do the right thing for Selden even thought it could send them to jail. If I was Sir Henry and I found out what they were doing I don't think I would have done anything. I would turn them in or help them, I would just let it be as it was before I knew. -Joscely Rebello
Here is a sample.
ReplyDeleteMiss Baudinet
Sherlock Homes is my favorite character in The Hound of the Baskervilles. Sherlock is a great detective but also does not seem to work in the ordinary way. His methods for being a detective are different than you would expect. He is also a very kind and helpful person in the book.
DeleteMy favorite part of the book is in the beginning of chapter fourteen when Sherlock Homes, Watson, and Sherlocks friend Lestrade go to save Sir Henry because they knew Stapleton was going to murder him. They were hiding behind rocks watching Stapleton, the murderer, and Sir Henry, the victim. They were planning on capturing Stapleton, when they heard a scream which was Sir Henry. Their whole plan got thrown off. The men saved Sir henry but instead if capturing Stapleton they killed the giant hound that was chasing Sir Henry.
One question that I have is - How did Stapleton keep the vicious hound a secret for such a long time? It would be very hard making sure that the hound is ready for action, not to loud and not to obvious. Adding on to this question is where did Stapleton find such an animal? Did Stapleton do something to the hound that turned it into a beast that killed for him?
Kaitlin Corso
Kaitlin,
DeleteCongratulations on being the first to post! Hopefully a few of your classmates will be able to suggest some answers for the questions you ask. There are clues in the book. My question for you is this:
What are three things Holmes does that make him seem abnormal or different from what you would expect in a detective? Explain what seems unusual about the examples you give.
- Miss Baudinet
My favorite character in The Hound of The Baskervilles had to be Sherlock Holmes. I like him because he was always one step ahead of everyone else, and he suspected Stapleton before he got the latest update from Dr. Watson. Sherlock always does background information on his cases so he can know a little bit more about what he is dealing with, and I think that’s a good quality to have. He is a very gifted detective and loves a good mystery case when he can find one.
DeleteMy favorite scene was when Holmes, Watson, and Lestrade were hiding outside the Stapleton’s house waiting for Sir Henry to leave dinner. Their plans go south when they hear Sir Henry scream on the way back to his house. The hound was attacking Sir Henry so they need to save him and kill the hound. While they were doing that it gave Stapleton plenty of time to escape. I like this scene because there is an exciting yet fearful tension in the group waiting outside. They are excited to finally catch Stapleton in the act, but they have no idea what they are up against.
A question that I have is – Why is Holmes so secretive about his theories and ideas? I would think that since Watson and Holmes are partners they would be more open about their theories.
Samantha Pearlstein
Good question, Samantha. Isaih has a few thoughts on that issue below. Here is your question:
DeleteWhat was Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s purpose in including the story of Selden, a criminal, but not the one responsible for the violent hound? Try to think of at least two reasons he may have included this character and side plot.
- Miss Baudinet
Kaitlin Corso-
DeleteTo answer your question concerning how and where the Hound was held.
Mr. Stapleton discovered an abandoned tin mine in the Grimpen mire, a swamp neighboring the moor. It was here within its depths that Stapleton kept the hound. He starved it by rarely sending his manservant to feed the large, mix-breed, hound. This starving cause the hound to become aggressive and feral, which meant that taking it out by day was not advised. The mine was only able to conceal most of its noise, twice in the book a howl is heard. Stapleton also treated the hound to a black phosphorus paste (phosphorous give things a trait of fire and explosiveness, it is used in firecrackers) to give the hound a devilish look. When the hound was ready to be used, Stapleton brought it out to an outhouse next to his estate which he could only do for a short period of time because of the size and noise of the hound. To make the animal track and kill, he would use an article of clothing owned by the target (Henry Baskervilles old black boot) and send him loose at night. This is what killed Seldon the convict. He was wearing Henry's old clothing when he was hiding out at night and was spooked into falling off a cliff. The animal was bought in London at a pet store, and it was said to be a special mix breed of a mastiff (they are famous for their size) and a bloodhound (famous for their tracking abilities). I hope this helped.
-Jorge Biaggi
In response to Ms. Baudinet's question,
DeleteI think that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle included the side plot of Selden, the criminal, so it would make the Barrymores seem suspicious. It made the Barrymores look suspicious because at night Mr. Barrymore was sneaking around to give Selden, who is also Mrs. Barrymore's brother, food. Another reason that the author included Selden may have been because of his criminal reputation as a very atrocious person. For that reason some people may think, in the beginning of the book, that he was responsible for the hound and the killings. Those are the two reasons that I think the author included Selden.
Samantha Pearlstein
My favorite character was Sherlock Holmes. He is my favorite character because he was able to keep his presence a secret for such a long time. He was also able to make a great educated guess on everything about Mr. Mortimer just by looking at his cane that he left at Sherlock's home/office.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite part of the book was when Sherlock and Watson were waiting for the hound. This was my favorite part because this was the only part of the book where I felt any real suspense. I also liked it because the hound was so vicious that it froze Sherlock and Watson in place and they almost missed their chance.
A criticism of the book I have is that I personally never got really interested in the story until the very end. The book never made me feel anything except when I felt suspense for a paragraph or two when they were waiting for and chasing the hound.
- Isaih O'Sullivan
Thanks, Isaih. Here is your question:
DeleteWhat are three incidents that really highlight Watson's amateur status as a detective? In other words, can you list three times Watson screws up or seems foolish or unintelligent?
- Miss Baudinet
Three incidents that highlights Watsons status as a detective are when he went to the cave home he left a cigarette butt outside and that signified his presence. Another time when Watson screws up is when Sherlock says that both of them will be going back to London he thought they were actually going back to London. He also messed up when he was questioning Mrs. Lyons he didn't ask who sent her or what caused her to not go to the hall.
Delete-Isaih O'Sullivan
Isaiah,
DeleteI noticed we saw eye to eye on most of the book. For example, we both had the same favorite part of the book, which is when Sherlock and Watson wait for the hound. On the same token, we both disliked the book and we had the same problems with the book. Our main problem with the book was how boring most of it was.
However, our favorite characters were very different, yours was Sherlock and mine was Stapleton. Now, I understand why you choose Sherlock thanks to your excellent explanation. Yet, unlike you I could not get over his plain personality and arrogance . Still I thought he was an amazing detective, which is why he is your favorite character . Although I found that Stapleton was just as smart as Sherlock, I liked his thinking, despite it being evil, and that is why he was my favorite character.
James Lawrence
Kaitlin, I think Sherlock is so secretive because if he lets other people know it could slip into the wrong persons hands and could be messed up. His theories could be messed up by said person changing how he does things. His plans could be messed up if said person waits in ambush or sets a trap. Hope this answered your question.
ReplyDelete-Isaih O'Sullivan
I think you are answering Samantha's question here, not Kaitlin's. You're right that Holmes doesn't trust Watson not to screw things up!
DeleteMiss Baudinet
Isaiah, I agree that the book was not that interesting in the beginning. There was no action or suspense until the last 4-5 chapters. As you finish the earlier chapters instead of suspense they would tell you what they discovered in an uneventful way. That made me feel like I did not want to read on because there wasn’t that much excitement.
DeleteKaitlin corso
MIss Baudinet-
DeleteIn the Hound of the Baskerville Sherlock Holmes has an abnormal and unusual behavior compared to other detectives. For example Sherlock Holmes always has to be neat and clean no matter what situation he is in. When he was staying up in the moor he has a young boy bring him fresh food, linen, and other objects. Most detectives should be able to live in gross circumstances . Sherlock also can be misleading at some points in the book. He lets Watson believe that he is doing all the work even though Sherlock does not trust him. Most detectives have partner that they can trust. Lastly Sherlock sets up Sir Henry and puts him in a dangerous situation. He puts his clients life in jeopardy and could have gotten him killed. A detective should be honest with his clients and would tell them what the plan is. Sherlock Holmes definitely has his own unique ways of solving the case.
Kaitlin Corso
My favorite character in The Hound of the Baskervilles is Sherlock
ReplyDeleteHolmes. I like Holmes because he kept secretive even to his own partner.
Sherlock Holmes is also a great detective and is very different in so living his
crimes, which I think is interesting.
My favorite part of the book is when Holmes and Watson set up their trap to
catch Stapleton at his own home. I liked this part because of the suspense it
has. You thought that the pair would get Stapleton but they heard a cry from Sir
Henry Baskerville and ended up killing the hound.
A critique I had- I wish we would have been able to find out Stapleton's motive
to kill so many people. Was it because he was hurt in the past? I am
disappointed from this ending. I believe it would have been better with some
explanation,
- Maggie McLaughlin
Paragraph 1 line3 *solving
Delete-Maggie McLaughlin
Thanks for the correction. Good proofreading!
DeleteMaggie,
DeleteMake sure to read carefully! As my question for you, I give you back your own critique: What was Stapleton's motive for killing so many people?
This question is clearly answered in the book. It is hinted at earlier when Holmes looks at a the portraits in Baskerville Hall. Then it is explained clearly in the last chapter, "A Retrospection." I suggest rereading this chapter. When you explain Stapleton's motives, please quote at least one line from the last chapter that helped you figure out the answer. Let me know if you have questions.
Miss Baudinet
Kaitlin, I think the hound may have been kept at his home in a room that you
ReplyDeletecannot hear anything from. I know that Mr.Stapleton would not reveal himself.
Maybe, Miss Stapleton knew about the hound but did not reveal it. I think she
may not have exposed the hound and Stapleton because of a threat or fear of
being killed by it.
- Maggie McLaughlin
To begin my writing, I am to say that I personally found that Dr. Watson was my favorite character. I found him to be like an apprentice to Holmes and he was more easy to relate to the reader. I liked this trait of Watson because it made me feel as if I was in the story. If Sherlock Holmes was more "realistic" (he acted as a deus ex machina more than anything else in my opinion) I would enjoyed the book slightly more (I did love it though),but he solves the cases to easily which makes Watson look like he has only just begun his career. Another concern I have is that the climax was very quick and underwhelming (I read the original print just as it was in The strand magazine with dates and all). I found it underwhelming because the event happened very quickly. This may be the point however because that is how all crimes must go, quick and quiet. My favorite part of the whole book was definitely the discovery of Barrymore signaling the criminal. This scene gave me the true feeling of tension and excitement as they were slowly creeping up on him. While reading that scene I truly began to feel suspicious of Barrymore and pinned the crime on him in my head with a (admittedly weak) theory on how he would pull the crime off. But to my surprise it was not Barrymore and i felt a slight sense of relief and disappointment when it was cleared up.
ReplyDelete-Jorge Biaggi
Jorge,
DeleteVery thoughtful response! Thank you for correcting some of your mistakes as well (although proofreading before publishing would be preferable). Here is your question:
The following selection is from Ch. 15. Explain what Holmes means here and give an example (other than the boot) of an incident in the story that fits this description.
"The more outre and grotesque an incident is the more carefully it deserves to be examined, and the very point which appears to complicate a case is, when duly considered and scientifically handled, the one which is most likely to elucidate it."
- Miss Baudinet
In response to miss Baudinet's question
DeleteTo begin, what Holmes means to say in this line is that certain evidence can be quite deceptive at first glance. In the case of the boot, Holmes believed that it was a minor and unimportant event witch required very little of his attention, yet in the end it proved to be a key part in the case. Another piece of evidence witch shared this same "trait" was the discovery of Barrymore signaling Seldon. After this was discovered, Watson believed that it was not going to play any part within his real case, but later that was proven wrong. If it was not for the discovery of Seldon, Mr. Barrymore would not have given him Mr. Baskerville's clothes (he had to give away as much as he could because he might not reappear) witch led to Seldon being tracked and killed by the hound. If not for this, Stapleton would not have shown up by the crime scene and would not have confirmed Watson and Holmes's theory of Stapleton being the mastermind of the crime.
-Jorge Biaggi
Jorge,
DeleteI agree completely about your critique stating how “the climax was very quick and underwhelming.” The buildup in the previous chapters were profoundly detailed that when the climax happened, it undermined my expectations. Also, considering how the chapters prior to the climax were written, it was very rushed. I had to reread chapter fourteen to catch all the details stated in that scene.
-Natasha Zaarour
To correct a grammar mistake I have made I will paste the fault and then correct it in a following line.
ReplyDeleteI would enjoyed the book slightly more
I would *have*enjoyed the book slightly more.
Apologies If I miss anything else.
-Jorge Biaggi
Also apologies for not dividing the prompts.
Delete-Jorge Biaggi
Also I misspelled the word *too* in one of my lines, I accidentally wrote *to* instead.
ReplyDeletehe solves the cases to easily
-Jorge Biaggi
My favorite character in "The Hound of the Baskervilles" is Sherlock
ReplyDeleteHolmes. Sherlock has all the qualities of a good detective. He makes wise
decisions, he thinks about the case, and plans ahead of time, and he
takes notes on the littlest things. He thoroughly investigates his cases,
making sure not to leave out anything important, and that's what makes
him such a keen detective.
My favorite part of the book was the last chapter (15). I found this chapter
very helpful and informative. The author wanted to make sure you
understood the final results of the case and what happened with
Stapleton. I liked that chapter because it took me through the issue once
more, and filled in the missing pieces well.
A criticism of the book I have is that the scenes seemed to change
quickly. One minute the characters are somewhere, and the next they're
somewhere else. In my opinion, that made it hard to follow and suddenly I
became lost.
-Lauren Chapman
Lauren,
DeleteI'm sorry for the delay. Here is your question: Explain how the character Laura Lyons tied in with the mystery and helped Holmes solve it.
Also, if you can add anything to your original post to make it less vague, that would be helpful. Currently, your comments could describe almost any mystery story. Giving examples, specifically in the third paragraph, could improve your post.
-Miss Baudinet
In addition to my first post, Holmes takes notes on the littlest things such as information before the mystery occurred, dates and times of certain events, and background knowledge of specific characters that may be tied into the case.
DeleteAlso, one of the scenes that seem to change quickly is when Holmes returns from Devonshire, England and surprises Watson, and the all the sudden, they catch Stapleton and kill the hound.
-Lauren Chapman
I'm going to have to agree with Isaih on this one. The story definitely
ReplyDeleteseemed boring, except for the last few chapters when there were
suspense. I think that this may be because of the words used in the book.
Some of the words, I think, were above our grade level. They were words
I've never seen nor heard before and that made me become confused/
uninterested.
-Lauren Chapman
In the book The Hound of the Baskervilles, my favorite character is Sherlock Holmes. Although quite sly, Holmes is an honest and respectable man. As a detective, Holmes is very rigorous and meticulous in his work. He shows many great qualities of being an exceptional detective, such as being indiscrete and observant.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite part of the book is when Watson discovers Holmes hiding out in the moor. Watson’s reaction when Holmes walks through the old, abandoned mine hut is very amusing. This scene shows how dedicated and observant Holmes can truly be.
One criticism that I have with the book is that I do not like how chapters eight and nine are presented in reports. Personally, I do not enjoy reading books that address to specific people, which in this case, was Holmes. I understand that a substantial part of Holmes’ case depended on those notes, but I didn’t think Watson’s notes were worth two chapters. Another criticism that I had about the book was that I didn’t like how Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the author, left Mr. Stapleton’s death. He describes his death as, “somewhere in the heart of the great Grimpen Mire, down in the foul slime of the huge morass which sucks him in, this old and cruel-hearted man is forever buried.” After examining the book multiple times, there is no actual proof that Stapleton is truly dead, for they only assume he is. I would like more detail about his death, for his death is too vague for me.
-Natasha Zaarour
Thanks, Natasha. Here is your question:
DeleteCan you briefly compare and contrast Selden and Stapleton in appearance and character? Sir Arthur Conan Doyle means for Stapleton to be the more sinister of the two criminals. Explain why Stapleton seems, in the end, more dangerous than Selden did.
Miss Baudinet
P.S. I think you mean to say Holmes is discreet, not indiscreet.
In response to Miss Baudinet,
DeleteIn the book the Hound of the Baskervilles, Selden, the convict, is perceived as a murderous convict. Selden is very dependent for he needs Mr. and Mrs. Barrymore to feed him. He also looks very raggedy and dirty because he has been in the moor for quite sometime. Mr. Stapleton, on the other hand, is a well-educated man that is very proper and poised. Unlike Selden, his clothing is neat and professional. Stapleton, in the end of the book seemed more dangerous than Selden because we find out he killed Sir Charles Baskerville in the beginning of the book in such a tortuous way. We also see how much effort and dedication went into killing the Baskervilles off.
Natasha Zaarour
Also, I did mean discreet instead on indiscreet
My favorite character in Hound of the Baskervilles is Sherlock Holmes. Holmes is a very mysterious and intelligent man. With every clue that he gets he reads between the lines and figures out the mystery much faster than Watson ever would've been able to do without him.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite scene of the book was when Holmes and Watson tell Laura Lyons about Mr. Stapleton putting on an act about how Mrs. Stapleton was his sister when it was really his wife. I like this scene becsuse because you know this is leading up to the climax and that there is a little more to Mr. Stapleton than we think.
I feel that the ending of the book could've gone on a little longer to find out what happened after because it ended suddenly and a litttle unexpected.
-Maddie Bessette
Maddie,
ReplyDeleteCan you be a little more specific about your criticism? It is a little vague. Remember that your posts should show strong knowledge of the book.
Here is my question for you:
Can you explain two or three times when Stapleton does something in front of Watson that, in hindsight, might indicate he is the one behind the attacks. In other words, looking back, did any of Stapleton's actions seem strange, cruel, or otherwise suspicious?
-Miss Baudinet
Continued Criticism:
DeleteI feel that the author couldve explained a little more when Holmes and Watsom got back to their house. I would've liked to know their thoughts on the whole situation.
Some clues about Stapleton being behind all the mischief around the moor were the fact that he was tricking people into thinking Mrs. Stapleton was his sister when t was really his wife. Another clue was when Sir Henry meets with Mrs Stapleton then Stapleton came over yeling and then apologizes and asks if Sir Henry would join them for dinner. Both of these show that he was hiding his identity and that there is more to him than we think
-Maddie Bessette
My favorite character in The Hound of the Baskervilles was Dr. Watson. I liked Dr. Watson because he was very brave going to Baskerville Hall, which was right near the moor, to help his client, Sir Henry Baskerville, escape a certain death. I also liked Dr. Watson he was persistently trying to keep Sir Henry Baskerville safe from the hound terrorizing the moor.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite part of the book was when Sherlock Holmes shot the hound. I liked when Sherlock shot the hound because it put an end to the murders and stopped Stapleton's hound from terrorizing the Baskerville family anymore. Also, this put a stop to the hound accidentally killing the wrong person, like Selden, the convict.
I had one criticism of the book. I did not like how it took the majority of the book to really make you want to read more and get the reader really intrigued. The first twelve chapters were okay but they didn't have enough action to set the foundation for the big action scene at the end of the book.
-Meghan Maguire
In response to Meghan's post,
DeleteI agree with you completely that the book was not very exciting until the last two or three chapters. In contrast, in any good mystery it's not interesting until the very end when all the facts and evidence start to pile up. I guess it is all a matter of opinion whether you think the mystery is uninteresting or still developing.
Samantha Pearlstein
In my post it should say
ReplyDeleteI also liked Dr. Watson (because) he was persistently trying to keep Sir Henry Baskerville safe from the hound terrorizing the moor.
-Meghan Maguire
Meghan,
DeleteThanks for your post. Here is your question:
Based on this book, what are three character flaws (negative qualities) Holmes seems to possess? Explain your reasoning by mentioning at least one thing he says or does from each of the three sections of the book (beginning, middle, end). In other words, don't answer this simply based on one single conversation he has. Base your answer on his behavior throughout the whole story.
- Miss Baudinet
In response to Samantha's post,
ReplyDeleteI believe that Holmes is so secretive about his theories and ideas because, being a detective as he is, you learn that you shouldn't trust anybody. I also agree with Samantha that Sherlock Holmes probably should have told his partner in advance about the plan. Yet, I think that he did not tell Watson in everyone's best interest. For example, if Dr. Watson knew about where Holmes was staying, he might be tempted to go deliver news about the case in person. In that case, if Stapleton were watching the moor through his telescope, he might suspect that something was going on. So, Holmes' decision to not tell Watson was, in my opinion, in the best interest of everyone.
-Meghan Maguire
I am not that big of a fan when it come to mystery books. However I like reading the Hardy Boys back in fifth grade. Sherlock Holmes was not very interesting to me, I found it very hard to make myself read this book. In the first ten chapters we learned about the crime and who the main suspects were in the case. I understand they had to explain the case but ten chapters is too much.
ReplyDeleteThe book was so boring, even during the climax of the story in the last five chapters, it got a lot better, but still did not entertain me. I like books that are action packed with multiple problems and different possible outcomes. Also, a book can almost never be good when the main character is as annoying as Sherlock Holmes. My main problem with him was his arrogance, he is more arrogant than Richard Sherman (a really big punk in the NFL). Even the way Sherlock Holmes talks, such as “But, tell me, Watson, what do you make of our visitor’s stick?” has to many pauses and is long winded. The book could have been better if even one of the characters had been even just a little funny, however, no one was funny and the book never made me laugh.
James Lawrence
I am not that big of a fan when it come to mystery books. However I like reading the Hardy Boys back in fifth grade. Sherlock Holmes was not very interesting to me, I found it very hard to make myself read this book. In the first ten chapters we learned about the crime and who the main suspects were in the case. I understand they had to explain the case but ten chapters is too much.
DeleteThe book was so boring, even during the climax of the story in the last five chapters, it got a lot better, but still did not entertain me. I like books that are action packed with multiple problems and different possible outcomes. Also, a book can almost never be good when the main character is as annoying as Sherlock Holmes. My main problem with him was his arrogance, he is more arrogant than Richard Sherman (a really big punk in the NFL). Even the way Sherlock Holmes talks, such as “But, tell me, Watson, what do you make of our visitor’s stick?” has to many pauses and is long winded. The book could have been better if even one of the characters had been even just a little funny, however, no one was funny and the book never made me laugh.
James Lawrence
Sorry here is the rest of my other post. My favorite character was Stapleton, even though he was the bad guy I thought his plan was really clever. Now I wish he was good but then the book would have no story. Many of his choices worked for a while till Sherlock Holmes discovered them. I bet however if it was not as big of a crime such as, if he killed an elder who lives alone, he could have gotten away with it.
DeleteMy favorite part of the book was chapter fourteen when Sherlock Holmes saves Sir Henry by killing the hound. This is the climax as well as the start of the falling action which normally are the biggest points of a book. This chapter stood out even more due to the fact that the rest of the book was boring. Still this chapter was the biggest part of the book which is why it is my favorite.
James Lawrence
James,
DeleteGood point about Holmes's arrogance. Spot on. Here is your question:
Can you describe three ways that the lack of 21st century technology made the case more difficult to solve than it might be today? (Or, what are three ways that modern technology might have made the case easier to solve?)If you're stuck, think about all the difficulties presented by the remote location of Baskerville Hall.
- Miss Baudinet
While reading the Hound of The Baskervilles I realized the case was a lot harder because of the time the story was set in, the past and not the present. An example of this is when Sir Charles dies at the start of the book, he would have brought his phone and a flashlight in present day. This would have allowed him to not only see the dog faster but also video tape his death or call 911. On the same token, Sir Henry would have left Baskervilles and would have been put in a safe house, where the dog could not attack him.
DeleteDuring the case, technology would have made it easier for Sherlock. Sherlock would have been able to watch the moor with cameras which would have shown Stapleton going down to the moor. Also the police would have looked for suspects and realized who Stapleton really was and would have interrogated him. Mrs. Stapleton would have been able to call for help when Stapleton was planning the attacks and when he hid her. From evidence of the case, which would have included food and supplies in the cave, they would have been able to scan for Stapleton thumbprints.
James Lawrence
I agree with Lauren about how the scene changes were very sudden and somethimes hard to follow. I feel like almost every other chapter you had to read certain parts multiple times to figure out where they went. This made the book a little difficult to understand. I think the authour could've done a better job at hinting at or stating where they were.
ReplyDelete-Maddie Bessette
Miss Baudinet, I am sorry about the mistake. I reread the chapter and found Stapleton's motive. His motive was an estate. Stapleton was the nephew of Sir Charles Baskerville and he had embezzled money so he moved twice and changed his name. When he realized that there were only two people in the way of the family fortune, Sir Charles and Sir Henry, he sought out to kill them. A line that helped find this was "The fellow had evidently made inquiry and found that only two lives stood between him and a valuable estate".
ReplyDelete-Maggie McLaughlin
Miss Baudinet,
ReplyDeleteHolmes shows the character flaw, condescension, when dealing with his partner Watson. For example, in a conversation between Holmes and Watson, Holmes says “I am afraid, my dear Watson, that most of your conclusions were erroneous.” This shows that Holmes doesn't think of Watson on the same level of intelligence as himself. Another character flaw that Holmes shows is accusing. When Watson and himself were looking over a body, killed by the hound, that they thought was Sir Henry, was when this flaw really stood out. In this conversation Holmes shows the flaw of being accusatory when he says “And you, Watson, see what comes of abandoning your charge!” This shows that Holmes feels bad about how the man got killed so he decided to blame the issue on Watson. Also, pride is a major character flaw in Holmes. This shows when he says “It's a thousand to one against our finding him at the house,” he continued as we retraced our steps swiftly down the path. This example shows that Holmes feels like he is correct in his theories most of the time and does not doubt himself enough.
-Meghan Maguire
In the Hound of the Baskervilles, my favorite character opinion changed as i went on reading the book. In the beginning i liked Sherlock Holmes, and his ability to problem solve and pick up on things like when trying to figure out who sent the note to Sir Henry, he observed that the note had ink spatters, connecting him to the conclusion, that the note was written at a hotel verses his home, because hotels have usually pens with bad ink. However, as the book went on I began to admire and enjoy the character Watson, Holmes' assistant, more and more. I like Watson's easygoing and very responsive personality and as the book went on, Watson seems to be more in the spotlight/more present then Holmes himself. Watson was the one who went on the stakeout and was the one to approach the Barrymores about their secret. Overall, i liked Watson's personality more and enjoyed reading about him in the book more than anyone else.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite part of the book, had to have been chapter nine. I liked chapter nine, because i felt the most suspense and thrill going on. Watson and Sir Henry staked out all night by the Barrymore's window to observe Mr. Barrymore and his actions, that might have something to do with Mrs. Barrymore and her distressed appearance, of late. Watson could have been in much danger, and could have put others in much danger by observing Mr. Barrymore, but he took the chance in order to help solve/end the Baskervilles case.
If i were to have one question/ critique after reading The Hound of the Baskervilles, it would have to be that the amount of characters and relationships in the book were,I felt, overwhelming and confusing. I felt this way especially in the end when Mr. Stapleton's dark and secretive past was revealed and his relationship between himself and "his sister" Miss Stapleton (really his wife) I also was confused about what happened in the end to Laura Lyons and Mr. Stapleton's plan in itself to destroy Sir Henry was a bit hard to latch on to, from my point of view.
-Victoria L. Rego
Victoria,
DeleteThanks for your post. Remember to capitalize the word "I." Here is your question:
Can you please explain how the setting in the story helps to increase the suspense, fear, and mystery of the book? (You'll have to briefly mention what the setting is to answer this.)
-Miss Baudinet
In response, to Natasha's post, i would have to agree in the sense that I was surprised when Holmes surprised/startled Watson and Sir Henry on the Moor, but would have to disagree in the point being made about Holmes and his personality. If i was Watson, I would be relieved in a sense, that no one dangerous was out behind the brush, but would be somewhat upset/annoyed that Holmes didn't trust me enough to solve the rest of the case on my own. I respect Holmes' "always one step ahead" personalty, but don't always agree with it especially when it comes to trusting Watson to finish the case... after all, Watson figured it out enough to get to the moor to begin with.
ReplyDelete-Victoria L. Rego (responding to Natasha Zaarour)
Miss Baudinet,
ReplyDeleteThe Hound of the Baskervilles, takes place in London in the year 1889. The story begins and ends at Holmes's office at 221b Baker Street, in London. Since the book is a mystery novel, the goal is to create fear and suspense in the readers mind, as they read through the book. This can be achieved by the author through the setting of the story. The majority of the suspense in the story, comes from the secrets and unsolved mysteries of the lonely moorlands. One particular section of the book, that created suspense and fear for me as a reader personally, was when Watson went to try to find the mysterious figure on the moor that might be of assistance to solving/ending the case. The moor is so big, open, unexplored and lonely, that mystery and fear already exist on the land. Aside from the moor, the rundown Merripit House also poses as a hide out and meeting place to wait for Stapleton at the end of the case. After reading this book, I would agree that the setting of the book does contribute/does attribute with the fear and suspense of the story.
Miss Baudinet,
ReplyDeleteThe Hound of the Baskervilles, takes place in London in the year 1889. The story begins and ends at Holmes's office at 221b Baker Street, in London. Since the book is a mystery novel, the goal is to create fear and suspense in the readers mind, as they read through the book. This can be achieved by the author through the setting of the story. The majority of the suspense in the story, comes from the secrets and unsolved mysteries of the lonely moorlands. One particular section of the book, that created suspense and fear for me as a reader personally, was when Watson went to try to find the mysterious figure on the moor that might be of assistance to solving/ending the case. The moor is so big, open, unexplored and lonely, that mystery and fear already exist on the land. Aside from the moor, the rundown Merripit House also poses as a hide out and meeting place to wait for Stapleton at the end of the case. After reading this book, I would agree that the setting of the book does contribute/does attribute with the fear and suspense of the story.
-Victoria L. Rego
*Sorry Miss Baudinet, I published the first post without signing it.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite character in The Hound of the Baskervilles was Dr. Watson because he was able to gather lots of information without the help of Sherlock Holmes and that is important because if he could not the case would have taken much longer. He also made me laugh when he had dinner with the neighbors on the moor when he was supposed to be gathering more information on the case.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite part in the book was when Watson is sitting in one of the abandoned huts on the moor waiting for a man to walk in and it turned out to be Sherlock Holmes. I liked it because Watson had his pistol drawn ready for it to be some sort of dangerous criminal yet it was his partner.
I expected this book to be more thrilling and suspenseful but I felt like there wasn't much emotion showed. It seemed very bland and didn't get me excited when anything happened.
-Cameron Smith
Cameron,
DeleteHere is your question:
Who is Mr. Frankland and how does he contribute to the progression of the plot? (First describe him and explain who he is and what he does. Then explain how he helps move the story along by helping Watson clear up some of the mysteries in the book.)
-Miss Baudinet
Miss Baudinet,
DeleteMr. Frankland is Laura Lyons father who we hear about in chapter ten. He is perceived as being somewhat out of his mind. Mr. Frankland likes to be involved in lawsuits that don't necessarily benefit him. Mr. Frankland spends his time looking over the moor with his telescope when he hears about the escaped convict.
Mr. Frankland helps Watson by giving him information about finding the "criminal". Watson then goes out to catch the "criminal" but it turns out to be his partner Sherlock Holmes.
-Cameron Smith
In response to Natasha's post
ReplyDeleteI agree how Mr. Stapleton's death was very unclear. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle did not give much detail about the setting and I had a hard time picturing the moor and the surrounding areas. This was a problem for me when I tried to figure out where Mr. Stapleton died because the author left it fairly unclear.
-Cameron Smith (responding to Natasha's post)
In the book "The Hound of the Baskervilles", a woman named Laura
ReplyDeleteLyons was tied in with the mystery, and helped Holmes solve it. Mr.
Stapleton, was actually in line to inherit the Baskerville fortune. For this
reason, he wanted Sir Charles Baskerville dead, so he could then receive
the money. Therefore, Laura Lyons was only a toy in Stapleton's game.
Stapleton convinced her to schedule an appointment with Sir Charles, to
help her with her previous affairs, and then miss it. Having brought Sir
Charles onto the moors, Stapleton released his devilish hound, which
frightened Sir Charles Baskerville and caused a heart attack. When
Watson interviewed Laura Lyons and got the information needed, he
immediately told Holmes, which helped him to piece the mystery together
more.
-Lauren Chapman
I disliked Sherlock Holmes at first; he did not seem to care much about the Baskervilles and was willing to rely on Watson for most of the case. However this proves not to be true Holmes was always in some way involved. He used a young boy Named Cartwright to watch Watson and reported back to him on what was going on. Sherlock Holmes was able to solve the mystery once he did some research on the suspects and got the information from Watson. He takes risks like allowing Sir Henry to go to Merripit House and be chased by the hound, but in the end it all works out. For these reasons Sherlock Holmes is my favorite character.
ReplyDelete-Joscelyn Rebello
My favorite character was Mrs. Stapleton because despite what her husband says and does to her to keep her quite she finds the good in her heart to warn Sir Henry about the danger that is upon him. But at the same time Mrs. Stapleton thinks through what she is doing and finds a smart way to warn Sir Henry that leaves very little evidence.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite part of the book was when the convict Selden died. I found it very funny how Sherlock and Dr. Watson are distraught over the death of “Sir Henry” and expressing how they believe it to be their fault that their friend is dead. But when Sherlock Holmes turns the body over they find it to be Selden.
My criticism for the book is it is quite unbelievable that the hound would eat another dog (Dr. Mortimer’s spaniel). I find it just weird (in the bad way) that the hound would do that.
-Merissa
Merissa,
DeleteHere is your question: What is the meaning of the idiom "red herring"? Look it up online and then give an example of a red herring in "The Hound of the Baskervilles." Explain what makes it a red herring.
- Miss Baudinet
Oops i made a spelling mistake, first paragraph second line "quite" should be quiet. Sorry.
ReplyDelete-Merissa
In response to Kaitlin's post Stapleton found such an animal at Ross and Mangles in London on Fulham Road. You can find all that information on page 214. And as to your third question, Stapleton got the hound to kill for him probably by treating him right and having a close relationship with it because a dog will do almost anything for its owner if it is treated right. But I could be wrong.
ReplyDelete-Merissa
I am replying to Miss Baudinet’s question of three examples of when Watson messes up. One example is when he gets mad at Sherlock for not telling him of his presence in the moor when if he just thought it through he would understand that the more people who knew of his position the more the likely word would get out and the investigation would be compromised. A second example is when Sherlock points out a family portrait and it takes Watson some time to catch on that it looks just like Mr. Stapleton. My third example is when Watson looks away from the path while on a steak-out knowing that the hound will show soon and that his friend’s life is in danger and misses his mark; nearly costing Sir Henry his life.
ReplyDelete-Merissa
My favorite part of the book is when Watson goes out on the moor looking for the unknown man. Watson had no idea who the man is or if the man was dangerous. Watson followed the path he saw a young boy took to give the man food. When Watson arrives at were the man is staying the man was not there so Watson waited for him to come back. While Watson is waiting he finds a note that reads "Dr. Watson has gone to Coombe Tracey" which makes him think the man is stalking him. The strange man ends up being Holmes after this the story really starts to come together.
ReplyDeleteThe question I have on the book is dose Watson have a job or dose he just work with Holmes?
-Joscelyn Rebello
ReplyDeleteJoscelyn,
DeleteHere is your question:
What do you think of the Barrymores? Were they criminals? If you were Sir Henry, would you have turned them over to the police? Fired them? Helped them feed Selden?
- Miss Baudinet
In response to Merissa’s question dogs will definitely eat other dogs. It’s not the hound was raised to be nice either it was raised to kill people a small dog would be ease. People have killed people and people have also eaten people why should dogs be any different. The hound was probably hungry and the small dog was the first thing it could get its teeth into.
ReplyDelete-Joscelyn Rebello
Here is my answer to Miss Baudinet’s question. A red herring is a clue that misleads and or distracts. An example of a red herring in The Hound of the Baskervilles is when Mr. Stapleton gives the taxi driver the name Sherlock Holmes. When Sherlock interrogates the taxi driver the name he receives is his own. This didn’t help Sherlock in his quest of solving the case Sir Henry presented to him.
ReplyDelete-Merissa Silva
I think that the Barrymores were good people who committed a crime. the Barrymores tried to do the right thing for Selden even thought it could send them to jail. If I was Sir Henry and I found out what they were doing I don't think I would have done anything. I would turn them in or help them, I would just let it be as it was before I knew.
ReplyDelete-Joscely Rebello